SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Sensitivity and Specificity should be De-emphasized in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleSensitivity and Specificity should be De-emphasized in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Karel G.M. Moons2003

Article2003

Sensitivity and Specificity should be De-emphasized in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Karel G.M. Moons · Frank E. Harrell

99 citations·0/0 files stored·Academic Radiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 99 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests 2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration 2003Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good 2000Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient 1999Evaluating Bias and Variability in Diagnostic Test Reports

Cited by

2013Predictive Validity Performance Indicators in Violence Risk Assessment: A Methodological Primer 2010Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage 2008The STARD Statement for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Application to the History and Physical Examination 2008Interpreting Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies 2010Clinical validity: Defining biomarker performance

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2004Test Research versus Diagnostic Researcharticle · 6 shared references 2006Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studiesarticle · 5 shared references 2013Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARDreview · 5 shared references 2005A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available toolsreview · 5 shared references 2004Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerationsreview · 5 shared references 2003The STARD Initiative and the Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracyeditorial · 5 shared references

Details

Year2003

Typearticle

Published2003-06-01

VenueAcademic Radiology

ISSN-L1076-6332

Languageen

Citations99

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80087-9

openalex_workW1976430876

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2018

Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) studies in older people

2020A new method for synthesizing test accuracy data outperformed the bivariate method

2008Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard