Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The validity and value of peer assessment using adaptive comparative judgement in design driven practical education

7 references·7 citing·32 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1991Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective3,725 cited
1950Creativity.3,720 cited
1999Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education2,180 cited
1954The measurement of values.459 cited
2020Journal of Technology Education436 cited
1999Assessment Matters In Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches348 cited
1996Assessment and Transferable Skills in Art and Design19 cited

Cited by

2015The problem of assessing problem solving: can comparative judgement help?67 cited
2018Using adaptive comparative judgment for student formative feedback and learning during a middle school design project56 cited
2014A comparative judgement approach to teacher assessment52 cited
2015Peer assessment using comparative and absolute judgement52 cited
2016Using comparative judgement and online technologies in the assessment and measurement of creative performance and capability40 cited
2016Comparative Judgement as a Promising Alternative to Score Competences38 cited
2019Adaptive Pairwise Comparison for Educational Measurement25 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work