SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus?
10 references·16 citing·32 second hop
Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus? (1988)Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensu…MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTIC (1987)MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE …The Hierarchy of the Sciences? (1983)The Hierarchy of the Sciences?Peer review in the National Science Foundation: Phase two of a study (1981)Peer review in the National S…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …Age and Scientific Performance (1979)Age and Scientific PerformanceThe Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability (1973)The Equivalence of Weighted K…Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Patterns of evaluation in sci…Age, aging, and age structure in science (1968)Age, aging, and age structure…The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observations. (1967)The hard sciences and the sof…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific R…Investigating disagreement in the scientific literature (2021)Investigating disagreement in…Publications in Four Sociology Journals, 1960–2010: The Role of Discipline Demographics and Journal Mission (2019)Publications in Four Sociolog…Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling (2012)Consensus formation in scienc…The Effect of an IS Article’s Structure on Its Impact (2010)The Effect of an IS Article’s…Peer Review in a Post-Eprints World: A Proposal (2000)Peer Review in a Post-Eprints…Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines: A comparative trend analysis of scholarship in the social, physical, and mathematical sciences (1999)Collaboration in sociology an…Faculty research productivity 1972?1988: Development and application of constant units of measure (1993)Faculty research productivity…Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)Reliability, fairness, object…Referee agreement in context (1991)Referee agreement in contextPredicting citations to journal articles: The ideal number of references (1991)Predicting citations to journ…Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings? (1991)Does the need for agreement a…If at first you don’t succeed: Review procedures for revised and resubmitted manuscripts (1990)If at first you don’t succeed…Fields or subfields of knowledge: Rejection rates and agreement in peer review (1990)Fields or subfields of knowle…Scientific Norms and Research Publication Issues and Professional Ethics* (1989)Scientific Norms and Research…Mixed Messages: Referees' Comments on the Manuscripts They Review (1989)Mixed Messages: Referees' Com…THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EVALUATION OF SCHOLARLY PERFORMANCE (1988)THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY …Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage (1974)Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. (1997)Theories of Creativity (2010)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluation (1991)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. (1999)Constructing knowledge: The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. (2002)Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods (2007)A Continuation of the Paradigm Wars? Prevalence Rates of Methodological Approaches Across the Social/Behavioral Sciences (2010)Advancing Scientific Research in Education (2004)Beyond blind faith: overcoming the obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation (2006)Legitimate judgment in art, the scientific world reversed? Maintaining critical distance in evaluation (2013)Reliability of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire (1995)Reliability of the 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire (2002)Sequential Analysis and Observational Methods for the Behavioral Sciences (2011)Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. (2003)The Superiority of Economists (2015)The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? (2016)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? (1988)Age and Great Invention (2010)Ties That Last (2013)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)Competing paradigms in qualitative research. (1994)Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions35,276 cited
  • 1973The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability3,355 cited
  • 1987MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTIC808 cited
  • 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 1983The Hierarchy of the Sciences?485 cited
  • 1979Age and Scientific Performance350 cited
  • 1968Age, aging, and age structure in science249 cited
  • 1967The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observations.115 cited
  • 1981Peer review in the National Science Foundation: Phase two of a study84 cited

Cited by

  • 1999Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines: A comparative trend analysis of scholarship in the social, physical, and mathematical sciences57 cited
  • 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
  • 1988THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EVALUATION OF SCHOLARLY PERFORMANCE50 cited
  • 1989Mixed Messages: Referees' Comments on the Manuscripts They Review41 cited
  • 1991

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?
39 cited
  • 2021Investigating disagreement in the scientific literature36 cited
  • 1991Predicting citations to journal articles: The ideal number of references32 cited
  • 1993Faculty research productivity 1972?1988: Development and application of constant units of measure18 cited
  • 2010The Effect of an IS Article’s Structure on Its Impact16 cited
  • 1990Fields or subfields of knowledge: Rejection rates and agreement in peer review14 cited
  • 1990If at first you don’t succeed: Review procedures for revised and resubmitted manuscripts14 cited
  • 1989Scientific Norms and Research Publication Issues and Professional Ethics*13 cited
  • 2012Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling12 cited
  • 1991Referee agreement in context12 cited
  • 2000Peer Review in a Post-Eprints World: A Proposal8 cited
  • 2019Publications in Four Sociology Journals, 1960–2010: The Role of Discipline Demographics and Journal Mission8 cited