Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Paradoxical effects of base rates and representation in category learning

14 references·6 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1973On the psychology of prediction.6,201 cited
1978Context theory of classification learning.3,060 cited
1986Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.2,767 cited
1992ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.1,582 cited
1988From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model.827 cited
1984Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification.740 cited
1988From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model.620 cited
1998Rules and exemplars in category learning.585 cited
1988Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience.286 cited
1996Base rates in category learning.179 cited
2001The inverse base-rate effect is not explained by eliminative inference.67 cited
2001High-level reasoning and base-rate use: Do we need cue-competition to explain the inverse base-rate effect?37 cited
2004Evidence for Rule-Based Processes in the Inverse Base-Rate Effect34 cited
2003Attentional Theory Is a Viable Explanation of the Inverse Base Rate Effect: A Reply to Winman, Wennerholm, and Juslin (2003).24 cited

Cited by

2016

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Effects of outcome and trial frequency on the inverse base-rate effect

9 cited

2021Hearing hooves, thinking zebras: A review of the inverse base-rate effect8 cited

2022Effect of a context shift on the inverse base-rate effect5 cited

2023g-distance: On the comparison of model and human heterogeneity2 cited

2016Measures of Bayesian Reasoning Performance on ‘Normal’ and ‘Natural’ Frequency Tasks0 cited

2017Expecting the unexpected: Base-rate neglect is driven by neural activation of common cues0 cited