SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation
7 references·16 citing·47 second hop
Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation (2005)Relativity of citation performance and ex…The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits (2002)The impact-factors debate: th…Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002)Journal impact measures in bi…Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? (2002)Benchmarking international sc…Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality (1997)Citations and journal impact …Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Problems of citation analysis…Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact (1986)Relative indicators and relat…Clustering thescience citation index ® using co-citations (1985)Clustering thescience citatio…Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)Interpreting Bibliometric DataProfessional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report (2016)Professional and citizen bibl…Citations: Indicators of Quality? The Impact Fallacy (2016)Citations: Indicators of Qual…Technology convergence: What developmental stage are we in? (2015)Technology convergence: What …Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? (2015)Methods for the generation of…The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations (2014)The European Union, China, an…Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science (2014)Field-normalized citation imp…A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators (2013)A systematic empirical compar…Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison (2012)Source normalized indicators …Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010)Rivals for the crown: Reply t…The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions (2009)The use of bibliometrics to m…Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? (2009)Should you believe in the Sha…Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery? (2009)Can literature analysis ident…The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns (2008)The most highly cited Library…Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance (2008)Subfield-specific normalized …Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences (2006)Delineating complex scientifi…Little Science, Big Science (1963)The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties (1974)Tracking and predicting growth areas in science (2006)Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents (2007)Mapping research specialties (2008)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis (1984)Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. (1994)A multicriteria decision analysis model for faculty evaluation (2011)Ratings and Rankings: Voodoo or Science? (2012)Online disclosure of university social responsibility: a comparative study of public and private US universities (2013)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics (1976)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences (2009)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)The sociology of science (1973)The skewness of science (1992)The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence (2003)The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2012)The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits (2012)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Does self-citation pay? (2007)The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery (2010)The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects (2014)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)BIBLIOMETRICS AS A RESEARCH FIELD A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators (2003)Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (2010)Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods (2016)Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 (1989)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation (2017)American Economic Review (2019)Insights from big Data Analytics in supply chain management: an all-inclusive literature review using the SCOR model (2019)Four challenges when conducting bibliometric reviews and how to deal with them (2021)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Overton: A bibliometric database of policy document citations (2022)Research Trends on Climate Change and Circular Economy from a Knowledge Mapping Perspective (2022)An analysis of reporting practices in the top 100 cited health and medicine-related bibliometric studies from 2019 to 2021 based on a proposed guidelines (2023)O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional (1998)Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? (2010)From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016)For Your Citations Only? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis (2005)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
  • 2002Journal impact measures in bibliometric research557 cited
  • 1986Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact448 cited
  • 2002The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits285 cited
  • 1985Clustering thescience citation index ® using co-citations282 cited
  • 1997Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality268 cited
  • 2002Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?251 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking?217 cited
  • 2021Interpreting Bibliometric Data174 cited
  • 2016Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report173 cited
  • 2013A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators149 cited
  • 2012Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison149 cited
  • 2016Citations: Indicators of Quality? The Impact Fallacy142 cited
  • 2006Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

141 cited
  • 2015Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?136 cited
  • 2014Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science122 cited
  • 2015Technology convergence: What developmental stage are we in?111 cited
  • 2008The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns111 cited
  • 2009The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions104 cited
  • 2010Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff104 cited
  • 2014The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations103 cited
  • 2009Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery?100 cited
  • 2008Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance100 cited