Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Measuring the quality of life in city of Indianapolis by integration of remote sensing and census data

9 references·9 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1960The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis12,390 cited
2013A First Course in Factor Analysis4,527 cited
1976Social Indicators of Well-Being3,679 cited
1993A First Course in Factor Analysis3,512 cited
1973A First Course in Factor Analysis 2nd Ed1,364 cited
2003Urban environmental quality and human well-being797 cited
2003Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—a social geographical perspective637 cited
2002Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome429 cited
1974THE GEOGRAPHY OF SOCIAL WELL-BEING37 cited

Cited by

2018A review of quality of life (QOL) assessments and indicators: Towards a “QOL-Climate” assessment framework133 cited
2021Comparison between Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Evaluating the Quality of Life at Different Spatial Levels63 cited
2025Urban Livability in a Rapidly Urbanizing Mid-Size City: Lessons for Planning in the Global South16 cited
2023Predicting the liveability of Dutch cities with aerial images and semantic intermediate concepts12 cited
2022Urban Disparities and Quality of Life Among Afghan Refugees Living in Informal Settlements in Mashhad, Iran

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

8 cited

2022How can innovation district performance be assessed? Insights from South East Queensland, Australia6 cited

2021Neighbourhood-level housing quality indices for health assessment in Dakar, Senegal5 cited

2022Predicting housing deprivation from space in the slums of Dhaka4 cited

2023A methodology for identifying typologies to improve innovation district outcomes: The case of South East Queensland1 cited