SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Authorship for Research Groups
2 references·11 citing·47 second hop
Authorship for Research Groups (2002)Authorship for Research GroupsPrevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews (2002)Prevalence of Honorary and Gh…Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Prevalence of Articles With H…Authorship Protocols Must Change to Credit Citizen Scientists (2019)Authorship Protocols Must Cha…An integrated intervention to reduce intimate partner violence and psychological distress with refugees in low-resource settings: study protocol for the Nguvu cluster randomized trial (2017)An integrated intervention to…Brazilian Science between National and Foreign Journals: Methodology for Analyzing the Production and Impact in Emerging Scientific Communities (2016)Brazilian Science between Nat…A Comprehensive Analysis of Authorship in Radiology Journals (2015)A Comprehensive Analysis of A…Organising a manuscript reporting quality improvement or patient safety research (2013)Organising a manuscript repor…Equal contributions and credit given to authors in anesthesiology journals during a 10-year period (2011)Equal contributions and credi…Determining authorship in multicenter trials: a systematic review (2011)Determining authorship in mul…Effects of Author Contribution Disclosures and Numeric Limitations on Authorship Trends (2010)Effects of Author Contributio…Publication of clinical trials: accountability and accessibility (2004)Publication of clinical trial…Critérios de autoria em trabalhos científicos: um assunto polêmico e delicado (2004)Critérios de autoria em traba…Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors (2004)Authorship in a small medical…When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions (2004)Prevalence and Factors of Intensive Care Unit Conflicts: The Conflicus Study (2009)Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major spine journals during a 10-year period (2015)Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (2021)Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review (2023)The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: a comparison of three general medical journals (2017)Application of entity linking to identify research fronts and trends (2019)A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences (2020)Publish or Perish: A Proposal (1986)Coautoria na produção científica do PPGGeo/UFRGS: uma análise de redes sociais (2011)Autoria em tempos de "produtivismo acadêmico" (2013)When Authorship Fails (1997)Everyday Ethics in Research: Translating Authorship Guidelines into Practice in the Bench Sciences (2008)Quantification of Authors’ Contributions and Eligibility for Authorship: Randomized Study in a General Medical Journal (2008)Best Practices for Allocating Appropriate Credit and Responsibility to Authors of Multi-Authored Articles (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care (1995)Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity (2008)Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences (2010)Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship (2016)Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers (2003)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Is advanced neuroimaging for neuroradiologists? A systematic review of the scientific literature of the last decade (2016)Effects of research complexity and competition on the incidence and growth of coauthorship in biomedicine (2017)Bibliometrics as a promising tool for solving publication ethics issues (2022)What is research collaboration? (1997)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? (2006)Local Chatter or International Buzz? Language Differences on Posts About Zika Research on Twitter and Facebook (2017)Productivity of CNPq Researchers from Different Fields in Biomedical Sciences: The Need for Objective Bibliometric Parameters—A Report from Brazil (2018)Linguistic Diversity Index: A Scientometric Measure to Enhance the Relevance of Small and Minority Group Languages (2021)Measuring Intrafamily Conflict and Violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales (1979)The Harvard Trauma Questionnaire. Validating a cross-cultural instrument for measuring torture, trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder in Indochinese refugees. (1992)Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (2013)Together to end violence against women in Tanzania: Results of a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate preliminary effectiveness of interpersonal and community level interventions to address intimate partner violence (2019)Problem solving therapy (PST) tailored for intimate partner violence (IPV) versus standard PST and enhanced usual care for pregnant women experiencing IPV in rural Ethiopia: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial (2020)Common mental disorders and intimate partner violence against pregnant women living with HIV in Cameroon: a cross-sectional analysis (2021)Publishing: Credit where credit is due (2014)A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship (2020)Global inequity in scientific names and who they honor (2020)Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research (2021)Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2021)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals553 cited
  • 2002Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews227 cited

Cited by

  • 2004Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors67 cited
  • 2019Authorship Protocols Must Change to Credit Citizen Scientists61 cited
  • 2010Effects of Author Contribution Disclosures and Numeric Limitations on Authorship Trends43 cited
  • 2016Brazilian Science between National and Foreign Journals: Methodology for Analyzing the Production and Impact in Emerging Scientific Communities34 cited
  • 2011Determining authorship in multicenter trials: a systematic review34 cited
  • 2017An integrated intervention to reduce intimate partner violence and psychological distress with refugees in low-resource settings: study protocol for the Nguvu cluster randomized trial33 cited
  • 2015A Comprehensive Analysis of Authorship in Radiology Journals29 cited
  • 2004Critérios de autoria em trabalhos científicos: um assunto polêmico e delicado28 cited
  • 2004Publication of clinical trials: accountability and accessibility27 cited
  • 2011Equal contributions and credit given to authors in anesthesiology journals during a 10-year period14 cited
  • 2013Organising a manuscript reporting quality improvement or patient safety research13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work