Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions

Tamara Bates · Ante Anić · Matko Marušić · Ana Marušić

199 citations0/0 files storedJAMA

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism scientometrics and bibliometrics research Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Abstract

CONTEXT: A number of general medical journals and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) request authors to disclose their contributions. Little is known about the effect of journal policies on authors' disclosure of their contributions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the number of named authors who do not meet ICMJE criteria for authorship, according to their published contributions, in 3 medical journals with different contribution disclosure practices. DESIGN: Observational study of authors' contributions in research articles published in 2002 in Annals of Internal Medicine (n = 72), BMJ (n = 107), and JAMA (n = 81). BMJ asks authors to describe research contributions in their own words; Annals asks authors to choose from a list of coded contributions; and JAMA uses a structured checklist with instructions on contributions that qualify for ICMJE authorship criteria. Honorary authorship was defined as the lack of contribution from the first ICMJE criterion (study conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data) and/or second (drafting the article or critical revision for important intellectual content) ICMJE criterion. RESULTS: According to authors' published contributions, the number of honorary authors was highest in Annals (121/562 authors, 21.5%), followed by BMJ (46/482, 9.5%), and JAMA (3/641, 0.5%) (chi2(2) = 146.67, P<.001). The number of articles with honorary authors was 60% in Annals, 21% in BMJ, and 4% in JAMA. Honorary authors had fewer published contributions than authors who met ICMJE criteria and were positioned more toward the end of the byline. Honorary authors either lacked contributions for both ICMJE criteria (10% in Annals and 22% in BMJ) or contributions to the second ICMJE criterion (75% in Annals, 67% in BMJ, and 2 out of 3 in JAMA). CONCLUSIONS: General medical journals differed in prevalence of honorary authors according to published research contributions of named authors. Different authorship/contributorship policies and procedures should be explored as a possible explanation for the differences in contributions disclosed by authors among these journals.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 199 citations exist upstream.

References

1997When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable 1998Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals 1997The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty

Cited by

2021Qualitative Research Methods 2021Research Design in Clinical Psychology 2016Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship 2014Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries 2007The Meaning of Author Order in Medical Research 2009Recognition, reward and responsibility: Why the authorship of scientific papers matters 2008Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity 2007A Descriptive Analysis of Authorship Within Medical Journals, 1995–2005

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.