SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Levels of evidence ratings in the urological literature: an assessment of interobserver agreement
7 references·0 citing·31 second hop
Levels of evidence ratings in the urological literature: an assessment of interobserver agreement (2010)Levels of evidence ratings in the urologi…How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test (2008)How to Use an Article About a…EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. (2008)EQUATOR: reporting guidelines…EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research (2008)EQUATOR: reporting guidelines…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…A Critical Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Urology Literature (2007)A Critical Assessment of the …Randomized Controlled Trials in Pediatric Urology: Room for Improvement (2006)Randomized Controlled Trials …Interobserver Agreement in the Application of Levels of Evidence to Scientific Papers in the American Volume of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2004)Interobserver Agreement in th…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases (2010)Use of 3x2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies (2012)COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker’s mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? (2006)International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal (2007)Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (2008)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Endocrinology Literature (2008)Reporting of Harm in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Urological Literature (2010)Predictors of citations in the urological literature (2011)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in burns care. A systematic review (2009)Core Journals That Publish Clinical Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions (2010)Do Journals Publishing in the Field of Urology Endorse Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of Author Instructions (2011)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Creation and Critique of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Use of the STARD and QUADAS Methodological Quality Assessment Tools (2007)Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index addendum for PTSD (PSQI-A) (2008)Diagnostic randomized controlled trials: the final frontier (2012)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Impact of coronavirus syndromes on physical and mental health of health care workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
  • 2008How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test456 cited
  • 2008EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research325 cited
  • 2008EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research.224 cited
  • 2004Interobserver Agreement in the Application of Levels of Evidence to Scientific Papers in the American Volume of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery100 cited
  • 2007A Critical Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Urology Literature89 cited
  • 2006Randomized Controlled Trials in Pediatric Urology: Room for Improvement42 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work