SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing
7 references·16 citing·37 second hop
How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing (1999)How can medical journals help prevent poo…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Impact of covert duplicate pu…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement (1996)Better reporting of randomise…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…The scandal of poor medical research (1994)The scandal of poor medical r…Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations (2018)Promoting public access to cl…Systematic review of control groups in nutrition education intervention research (2017)Systematic review of control …How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis (2015)How individual participant da…Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal Instructions to Authors (2014)Reporting of interventions in…Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond (2012)Improving the reporting of ra…Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals (2011)Common statistical and resear…Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting (2010)Clinical trials should begin …Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet (2008)Selective reporting in clinic…Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report (2007)Reports of clinical trials sh…Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis (2005)Outcome selection bias in met…Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study (2005)Comparison of descriptions of…Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Using the Internet for Survey…Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals (2002)Discussion Sections in Report…Publishing study protocols: making them visible will improve registration, reporting and recruitment (2001)Publishing study protocols: m…Time to register randomised trials (1999)Time to register randomised t…Unbiased, relevant, and reliable assessments in health care (1998)Unbiased, relevant, and relia…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews (2007)A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in Children (2008)Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical (1998)Funnel Plots in Meta-analysis (2004)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Collaborative care for depression in primary care (2006)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) (1997)A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys (2000)Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities (2001)Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (2006)Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel (2010)Web-based Questionnaires: The Future in Epidemiology? (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial (2000)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice (2002)The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
  • 1997Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study699 cited
  • 1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement610 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited

Cited by

  • 2002Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research789 cited
  • 2005Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study209 cited
  • 2005Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis187 cited
  • 2010Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting166 cited
  • 2007Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report129 cited
  • 2002Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals125 cited
  • 2008Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

120 cited
  • 2012Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond118 cited
  • 1998Unbiased, relevant, and reliable assessments in health care98 cited
  • 2018Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations83 cited
  • 2011Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals75 cited
  • 2001Publishing study protocols: making them visible will improve registration, reporting and recruitment63 cited
  • 2017Systematic review of control groups in nutrition education intervention research62 cited
  • 2015How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis57 cited
  • 2014Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal Instructions to Authors53 cited
  • 1999Time to register randomised trials45 cited