Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanity.

16 references·16 citing·32 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1957A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance24,224 cited
2017A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance18,122 cited
1967The Social Construction of Reality13,820 cited
1988Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders12,526 cited
1981Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed7,356 cited
1988Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.) American Psychiatric Association (1987). American Psychiatric Press, Inc., 1400 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. 567 pp., $39.95 hardcover; $29.95 softcover.5,240 cited
1972Self-Perception Theory5,236 cited
1980Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed5,189 cited
2020Social Construction of Reality4,707 cited
1986Human cognition in its social context.708 cited
1986Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.659 cited
1978Right and Wrong574 cited
1971The American Jury551 cited
1988Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments526 cited
1967The American Jury.467 cited
1983

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Inside the jury

440 cited

Cited by

1994Demythologizing inaccurate perceptions of the insanity defense.156 cited
2010Mind Perception132 cited
2003Psychopathic traits predict attitudes toward a juvenile capital murderer94 cited
2010Crime-Show-Viewing Habits and Public Attitudes Toward Forensic Evidence: The “CSI Effect” Revisited51 cited
2007Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision‐making48 cited
2005Expert Evidence, the Adversary System, and the Jury43 cited
2017Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors’ application of instructions.38 cited
2009Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity29 cited
2000Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill.28 cited
2003Undermining Reasonableness: Expert Testimony in a Case Involving a Battered Woman who Kills27 cited
2002The Influence of Empathy in Mock Jury Criminal Cases: Adding to the Affect Control Model25 cited
2006NGRI Revisited: Venirepersons' Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense123 cited
2006Emotions and culpability: How the law is at odds with psychology, jurors, and itself.22 cited
2016Religious fundamentalism, religiosity, and priming: effects on attitudes, perceptions, and mock jurors’ decisions in an insanity defense case22 cited
1995Factors that influence jury decision making: Disposition instructions and mental state at the time of the trial.20 cited
1993Verdict selection processes in insanity cases: Juror construals and the effects of guilty but mentally ill instructions.18 cited