Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Deluded by Artifices? The Common European Framework and Harmonization

5 references·16 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2013The standards for educational and psychological testing.6,992 cited
1991Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing4,362 cited
2001The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests699 cited
2014Testing Second Language Speaking603 cited
2000The Development of a Common Framework Scale of Language Proficiency324 cited

Cited by

2016Second and Foreign Language Assessment165 cited
2011Managing learning: Authority and language assessment99 cited
201430 Years on—Evolution or Revolution?92 cited
2006Validity in Language Testing: The Challenge of Sam Messick's Legacy89 cited
2016Reconceptualizing the Nature of Goals and Outcomes in Language/s Education84 cited
2014Communicative Language Testing: Current Issues and Future Research79 cited
2017Developing the China Standards of English: challenges at macropolitical and micropolitical levels76 cited
2016English Education Policy in Saudi Arabia: English Language Education Policy in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Current Trends, Issues and Challenges74 cited
2014The MERLIN corpus: Learner language and the CEFR71 cited
2012Proficiency Level--a Fuzzy Variable in Computer Learner Corpora

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

67 cited

2017One Framework to Unite Them All? Use of the CEFR in European University Entrance Policies62 cited

2008Language Policy and Language Assessment: The Relationship58 cited

2019Language and Subjectivity58 cited

2012LINGUISTIC CORRELATES OF SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY50 cited

2017The English Grammar Profile of learner competence50 cited

2015Opposing tensions of local and international standards for EAP writing programmes: Who are we assessing for?49 cited