Organizational space/time: From imperfect panoptical to heterotopian understanding

Abstract

Within the managerial arena the last century can be characterised, or perhaps caricatured, as being concerned with the pursuit of control and efficien cy. In this pursuit space and time were treated as a priori categories that have been commodified, rationalised and considered deterministically. The last two decades have, however, seen an increasing emphasis on the role of the intangible intellectual, emotional and attitudinal properties of organizations. While orga nization studies, and theory building, shifted in favour of these intangible factors, ma instream authors, together with many in the managerial community, continue to ignore these studies except where they contribute to establishing further control. Consequently many have critiqued contemporary ma nagement practice as exercising total, panoptic, control over the time/space of employ ees. While accepting the rh etorical strength of these studies, we argue that control is necessarily imperfect, as disorder remains immanent in the construction of order and is subject to its own process of becoming. However, the suggested ‘imperfect panopticon’ itself falsly dichotomizes important aspects of spatial/temporal experience in placing control against freedom, good against bad. In contrast the conceptualisation of sp ace and time developed in this paper suggests these categories should be understood theoretically as co mplex and post-rational. We seek to inform an emergent heterotopian theory/practice that em braces complexity and ambiguity, proposing a new perspective that we believe is significant for innovation, knowledge and power

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.