Type I, Type II, and other types of errors in pattern analysis.

Arthur B. Silverstein

31 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Statistical Methods and Applications

Abstract

Krauskopf(1991) is to be commended for calling attention to the fact that pattern analysis is subject not only to Type I errors but also to Type II errors, which were not even mentioned by Silverstein (1982). There are, however, a number of points on which the 2 authors still differ. Most notably, Krauskopf's recommendation not only fails to solve the multiple-comparisons problem, it exacerbates that problem. Other possibilities are considered, including the possibility that the assumption on which pattern analysis is based-clinical meaningfulness-is itself an error

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

1955Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.1958The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence 1958The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence (4th ed.).1979Intelligent testing with the WISC-R 1990Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence

Cited by

2003Who Are the Comorbid Adolescents? Agreement Between Psychiatric Diagnosis, Youth, Parent, and Teacher Report 2005Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, Successive (PASS) Theory: A Revision of the Concept of Intelligence.2019Challenges to the Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory: Empirical, Clinical, and Policy Implications 1999Structure and Diagnostic Benefits of a Normative Subtest Taxonomy Developed from the WISC-III Standardization Sample 2000Can profile analysis of ability test scores work? An illustration using the PASS theory and CAS with an unselected cohort.2008Using the Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, Successive (PASS) Theory Within a Neuropsychological Context 2011Assessment of Cognitive and Neuropsychological Processes 2003Comprehensive Tables for Determination of Strengths and Weaknesses on the WMS-III

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.