No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This paper analyzes a general model of two-player bargaining in the shadow of war, where one \nplayer possesses private information concerning the expected benefits of war. I derive conclusions \nabout equilibrium behavior by examining incentive compatibility constraints, where these constraints \nhold regardless of the game form; hence, the qualitative results are "game-free." I show that the \nhigher the informed player's payoff from war, the higher is his or her equilibrium payoff from settling \nthe dispute short of war, and the higher is the equilibrium probability of war. The latter result rationalizes \nthe monotonicity assumption prevalent in numerous expected utility models of war. I then \nprovide a general result concerning the equilibrium relationship between settlement payoffs and the \nprobability of war.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 157 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.