Article2004

The Politics of Administrative Reform in East and Southeast Asia: From Gridlock to Continuous Self‐Improvement?

64 citations0/0 files storedGovernance

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Public Policy and Administration Research Public Administration and Governance Public Administration in Developing Nations

Abstract

This article compares patterns and outcomes of administrative reform in four countries: Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand. It focuses on the supply side, that is, on reform implementation. It is assumed that bureaucrats, upon whom implementation depends, have an interest in controlling the process. A distinction is made between two types of bureaucratic systems—autonomous and instrumental—according to structural features that increase the potential to block reforms. Four possible patterns of administrative reform are distinguished according to whether demand is high or low, and whether the bureaucracy can be classed as autonomous or instrumental. More broadly, it is argued that supply will be lower in autonomous bureaucratic systems. A comparative case study method is applied to test this model, and the proposition is not disconfirmed. Malaysia and Singapore, both classed as instrumental bureaucracies, demonstrate a predictable style of “continuous administrative self‐improvement.” The status of the bureaucracy in Thailand and Taiwan is in transition, and the model is used to analyze changes in reform patterns over time and to suggest future trajectories.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 64 citations exist upstream.

References

1995Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism 2000Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis 1994The Failure of Presidential Democracy 1994Politician’s Dilemma 1994Politician's dilemma: building state capacity in Latin America 1983Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government 2019The New Public Management 2001New public management : the transformation of ideas and practice

Cited by

2008Administrative reform in China's central government — how much `learning from the West'?2015Administrative reform in South Korea: New Public Management and the bureaucracy 2006Thaksinisation or managerialism? Reforming the Thai bureaucracy 2007The usefulness of key performance indicators to public accountability authorities in East Asia 2017What Works and Why? Lessons from Public Management Reform in Malaysia 2013THE SEARCH FOR A MODEL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN HONG KONG: WEBERIAN BUREAUCRACY, New PUBLIC MANAGEMENT OR SOMETHING ELSE?

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.