Normative data and psychometric properties for qualitative and quantitative scoring criteria of the Five-point Test

Abstract

The Five-point Test (Regard, Strauss, & Knapp, 1982) was introduced for the measurement of figural fluency as part of the examination of executive functions. Until now, no differentiated norms exist. We present normative data for adults aged 18-80 (n = 280) for the number of unique designs (productivity), the percent of perseverations (flexibility), the percent of rotated (strategic) designs, and the number of rule breakings. As age and education were correlated with test performance, norms were stratified by these two variables. Test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability were calculated. Moreover, convergent and divergent validity as well as factorial validity were assessed through intercorrelations and correlations with other neuropsychological tests. All together, the Five-point Test proved to be reliable and valid.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 90 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.