Workbronze2010

Reviewing the reviewers: A study of author perception on peer reviews in computer science

Conny Kühne · Klemens Böhm · Jing Zhi Yue

8 citations0/0 files storedInternational Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication scientometrics and bibliometrics research Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Abstract

Peer reviewing is an important form of collaborative work that is used for quality assurance in science and in other domains like software development and knowledge management. Review ratings by authors have potential to improve the quality of peer reviews, by giving way to remuneration of good revi

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2011Research design and statistical analysis 1987Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review.2005Eliciting Informative Feedback: The Peer-Prediction Method 1989Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect 2002Author Perception of Peer Review 1998Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts 2002Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews 1994Academic Careers for Experimental Computer Scientists and Engineers

Cited by

2018Peer review in the development of academic articles: Experiences of Finnish authors in the educational sciences

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.