Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reviewing the reviewers: A study of author perception on peer reviews in computer science

11 references·1 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011Research design and statistical analysis1,213 cited
1987Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review.1,099 cited
2005Eliciting Informative Feedback: The Peer-Prediction Method507 cited
1989Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect355 cited
2002Author Perception of Peer Review140 cited
1998Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts122 cited
2002Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews76 cited
1994Academic Careers for Experimental Computer Scientists and Engineers42 cited
2008Author Perception of Peer Review34 cited
1990Effect of Acceptance or Rejection on the Author's Evaluation of Peer Review of Medical Manuscripts31 cited
2006Nature's Peer Review Debate16 cited

Cited by

2018Peer review in the development of academic articles: Experiences of Finnish authors in the educational sciences7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work