I Just Want My Research Credit: Frequency of Suboptimal Effort in a Non-Clinical Healthy Undergraduate Sample

Jonathan DeRight · Randall Steven Jorgensen

93 citations0/0 files storedThe Clinical Neuropsychologist

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Cognitive Abilities and Testing Historical and Modern Theater Studies

Abstract

Although performance validity testing is becoming fairly routine in clinical settings, research protocols involving neuropsychological tests infrequently include assessments of performance validity. The current study utilized an embedded measure of effort over two administrations of CNS Vital Signs to determine the frequency of poor effort in non-clinical healthy undergraduate students participating in a research study for course credit. Results indicate that more than 1 in 10 college students participating in a cognitive test battery for research showed test scores consistent with inadequate effort, which was associated with poor performance on testing across many domains. This conclusion was supported by poor performance on many other subtests. Healthy college students with suboptimal effort (n = 11) had an overall score in the 15th percentile on average compared to the 48th percentile in the rest of the students (n = 66). Those who failed validity indicators on the baseline administration were more likely to fail validity indicators on the repeat administration. Those who were tested in the morning were also more likely to fail validity indicators. The current study provides evidence for the potential limitations of conducting research using neuropsychological tests with healthy college student volunteers in the absence of performance validity testing. Revised college-level cutoffs are proposed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 93 citations exist upstream.

References

1993The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation 1955The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage.1987California Verbal Learning Test 2014Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs 2009American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering 2005Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee 2016Brain and Intelligence

Cited by

2016Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: a comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs 2020Effective Gamification of the Stop-Signal Task: Two Controlled Laboratory Experiments 2015One step ahead: The perceived kinematics of others’ actions are biased toward expected goals.2015Neuroimaging as a biomarker in symptom validity and performance validity testing 2016The effects of gamelike features and test location on cognitive test performance and participant enjoyment

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.