How to peer review a scientific or scholarly article

Abstract

This article describes the process of peer review from receipt of an article by a journal to publication. The need for timely response is explained. The importance and method of completing a helpful peer review is detailed. Specifically the areas of originality, structure, language, and ethical concerns are discussed. Communication between the peer reviewer and both the authors and the editors is highlighted.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.