Joint Reviews: Judgement Day and Beyond

Unknown author

6 citations0/0 files storedThe British Journal of Social Work

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Social Work Education and Practice Regulation and Compliance Studies

Abstract

Joint Reviewers are the central regulators of social services authorities in England and Wales. This article explores how reviewers arrive at their judgements about the performance of social services authorities and how these authorities respond to Joint Review reports and recommendations. It also offers a framework for evaluating the costs and benefits of Joint Reviews which enables us to appreciate the ambivalence which local authority staff harbour towards their central regulators.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1999The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification 1997The audit society 1997Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction 1999Regulation Inside Government 2003Coercive accountability 2011Local Government in the United Kingdom 1994The Politics of Decentralisation 1994The politics of decentralisation : revitalising local democracy

Cited by

2014Satisfactory Progress? Keywords in English School Inspection 2026How Have the Transformations of Supreme Audit Institutions Shaped Contemporary Public Auditing? A Professional, Process, and Stakeholder Perspective

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.