Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits?

16 references·16 citing·43 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1995Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship13,329 cited
1997A RESOURCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE ON CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND PROFITABILITY.4,813 cited
2003The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach2,079 cited
1996DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE1,948 cited
1995Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?1,874 cited
2008Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview1,757 cited
1995Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?1,748 cited
1994It's not Easy Being Green1,437 cited
2001Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?1,403 cited
2000Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?1,338 cited
2001Does It Really Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance1,051 cited
2005The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle963 cited
2010Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis663 cited
1997Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

486 cited

2002The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis of the European paper industry477 cited

2005How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry445 cited

Cited by

2020Market-based environmental regulation and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese enterprises290 cited
2018Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: Evidence from China284 cited
2020An Efficiency Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Financial Performance266 cited
2017Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Environmental Performance on Corporate Financial Performance in Developed and Developing Countries257 cited
2018It is merely a matter of time: A meta‐analysis of the causality between environmental performance and financial performance252 cited
2019Boardroom gender diversity: Implications for corporate sustainability disclosures in Malaysia247 cited
2020Macroeconomic, social and environmental impacts of a circular economy up to 2050: A meta-analysis of prospective studies200 cited
2017Internationalization and economic performance: The mediating role of eco-innovation162 cited
2015The relationship between environmental performance and financial performance in periods of growth and contraction: evidence from Australian publicly listed companies153 cited
2022Climate transition risk, profitability and stock prices150 cited
2020Does it pay to be green? A disaggregated analysis of U.S. firms with green patents145 cited
2019Impact of financing constraints on firm's environmental performance: Evidence from China with survey data135 cited
2016The Effect of Environmental, Social and Governance Consistency on Economic Results128 cited
2019Green innovation and brand equity: moderating effects of industrial institutions125 cited
2020Environmental assets, industry 4.0 technologies and firm performance in Spain: A dynamic capabilities path to reward sustainability122 cited
2016What are the benefits and difficulties in adopting an environmental management system? The opinion of Italian organizations120 cited