SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ética de la publicación científica: iniciativas y recomendaciones
6 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Ética de la publicación científica: iniciativas y recomendaciones (2012)Ética de la publicación científica: inici…Research Misconduct Policies of Social Science Journals and Impact Factor (2010)Research Misconduct Policies …Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey (2009)Science journal editors’ view…The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality (2007)The Relationship of Previous …Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective (2006)Best Practice Guidelines on P…Las revistas españolas de ciencias de la documentación: productos manifiestamente mejorables (2001)Las revistas españolas de cie…The evolution of the "scientific misconduct" issue: An historical overview. (2000)The evolution of the "scienti…Ética y revistas científicas españolas de Comunicación, Educación y Psicología: la percepción editora (2014)Ética y revistas científicas …Especialización y revistas académicas españolas de Comunicación (2014)Especialización y revistas ac…A literature-based innovation output indicator (1996)The deconstructed journal — a new model for academic publishing (1999)La investigación sobre Comunicación en España (1998-2007). Análisis de los artículos publicados en revistas científicas (2011)Análisis de la investigación sobre ética de la comunicación en España (1980-2015) (2017)Estudio bibliométrico de la producción científica sobre narrativa transmedia en España hasta 2016: Análisis descriptivo de las 20 principales revistas de comunicación españolas según Google Scholar Metrics (h5) (2017)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)The Responsible Conduct of Research (2001)Responsible Conduct of Research (2009)Credit and Authorship Practices: Educational and Environmental Influences (2010)Measuring Scientific Misconduct—Lessons from Criminology (2014)Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies (2020)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions (2001)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial (2012)Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews (2016)Lessons from the Darsee Affair (1983)Stealing into Print (1992)Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research (1996)Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct (2005)Retractions in the Engineering Field: A Study on the Web of Science Database (2017)Research integrity: environment, experience, or ethos? (2019)Mail and internet surveys (1999)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies (2011)Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys (2014)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Características y difusión de las revistas científico-técnicas españolas de ciencias de la actividad física y el deporte (2007)Descripción y análisis del proceso de evaluación de la calidad de las revistas científicas españolas llevado a cabo por FECYT en el año 2008 (2010)Scientific output in library and information science: A comparative study of the journals Anales de Documentación and BiD textos universitaris en biblioteconomia i documentació (2017)Use of the h index in neurosurgery (2009)Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal. Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field science research. (2013)Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2015 (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective231 cited
  • 2009Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey155 cited
  • 2007The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality139 cited
  • 2010Research Misconduct Policies of Social Science Journals and Impact Factor57 cited
  • 2000The evolution of the "scientific misconduct" issue: An historical overview.41 cited
  • 2001Las revistas españolas de ciencias de la documentación: productos manifiestamente mejorables17 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Ética y revistas científicas españolas de Comunicación, Educación y Psicología: la percepción editora15 cited
  • 2014Especialización y revistas académicas españolas de Comunicación14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work