Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool.

Jacqueline Renee Evans · Stephen Worth Michael · Christian A. Meissner · Susan E. Brandon

95 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Deception detection and forensic psychology Misinformation and Its Impacts Memory Processes and Influences

Abstract

Abstract The current set of studies was designed to test a new credibility assessment tool, the Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool (PBCAT). Participants watched lab-generated videos of true and false alibi statements, provided while under varying degrees of cognitive load. Judges either provided a truth/lie judgment only, or also rated 11 behavioral cues on the PBCAT. When stories were told under cognitive load the effectiveness of cues at discriminating truth/deception was enhanced, with targets under higher load judged more accurately. Results regarding the new assessment tool indicate that it is capable of improving deception detection performance, even with minimally trained, nonexpert observers.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 95 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Cues to deception.2006Accuracy of Deception Judgments 1985Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage 2008Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities 2010Pitfalls and Opportunities in Nonverbal and Verbal Lie Detection 2007Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.2002"He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception.2006A World of Lies

Cited by

2018Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues 2017Developing an evidence-based perspective on interrogation: A review of the U.S. government’s high-value detainee interrogation group research program.2014Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: searching for cognitive mechanisms 2015Improving the Effectiveness of Suspect Interrogations 2018Miami University deception detection database 2019Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.