Moving Image History and the F-Word; or, "Digital Film" Is an Oxymoron

Dan Streible

5 citations0/0 files storedFilm History

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cinema History and Criticism Visual Culture and Art Theory Cinema and Media Studies

Abstract

Film historians and Film History face the historiographical problem of naming their object of study. What will the word film mean from this point forward? Now that digital video files have displaced photochemical motion-picture film, historians and scholars should avoid referring to digital moving image works as films.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Silent Cinema, an Introduction 1995Burning passions: an introduction to the study of silent cinema 20123D in Depth: Coraline, Hugo, and a Sustainable Aesthetic 2011Present at the Creation: A Memoir

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.