The structured interview: Additional studies and a meta‐analysis

Patrick M. Wright · Philip A. Lichtenfels · Elliott D. Pursell

113 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Occupational Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Employer Branding and e-HRM Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Medical Education and Admissions

Abstract

Hunter & Hunter (1984) recently performed a meta‐analysis on research on the interview for selection purposes and concluded its validity to be 0.14. The structured interview may be a promising alternative to the traditional unstructured interview. A review of structured interview studies is discussed and six additional validations are presented. A meta‐analysis performed on structured interview validities resulted in an estimated validity of 0.39. Research implications are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 113 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1998Racial group differences in employment interview evaluations.2000The Relation of Candidate Personality With Selection‐Interview Outcomes 2016AN APPROACH TO PERSONNEL SELECTION BASED ON SWARA AND WASPAS METHODS 2014Moving Forward Indirectly: Reanalyzing the validity of employment interviews with indirect range restriction methodology 1999A meta-analysis of the situational interview: An enumerative review of reasons for its validity.1998The Influence of Applicant and Interviewer Characteristics on the Use of Impression Management1 2017Automated video interview judgment on a large-sized corpus collected online 1993The Validity of the Employment Interview: A Meta‐Analysis

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.