No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This essay asks why Aristotle, certainly no friend to unlimited democracy, seems so much more comfortable with unconstrained rhetoric in political deliberation than current defenders of deliberative democracy. It answers this question by reconstructing and defending a distinctly Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation, one that can be pieced together out of a series of separate arguments made in the Rhetoric, the Politics, and the Nicomachean Ethics.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 138 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.