Third sector commissioning and English local government procurement

John G. Murray

25 citations0/0 files storedPublic Money & Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Procurement and Policy Public Policy and Administration Research Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering

Abstract

This article investigates third sector commissioning policy commitments and their relevance to English local government procurement. The conclusion is that there is confusion regarding the differences between commissioning and procurement. Policy commitments are not properly embedded in procurement policy, strategy, procedures and performance management. Other countries with an interest in these policy developments should take note of the issues regarding embedding in order to improve service delivery and commissioning decisions.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

1953Field Theory in Social Science 1951Field Theory in Social Science 1938The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces.1997Business Research 2003Changing Public Service Organizations: Current Perspectives and Future Prospects 2008Instituting the ‘third sector’ as a governable terrain: partnership, procurement and performance in the UK 2000Government‐Voluntary Sector Compacts: Governance, Governmentality, and Civil Society 2007REFORMING PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE UK: BRINGING IN THE THIRD SECTOR

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.