SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientific authorship and intellectual involvement in the research: Should they coincide?
8 references·2 citing·42 second hop
Scientific authorship and intellectual involvement in the research: Should they coincide? (2014)Scientific authorship and intellectual in…Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Responsible Conduct of Resear…Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies (2011)Authorship and Responsibility…How ghost-writing threatens the credibility of medical knowledge and medical journals (2010)How ghost-writing threatens t…Authorship: why not just toss a coin? (2008)Authorship: why not just toss…Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Requisitos uniformes para man…AUTHOR, CONTRIBUTOR OR JUST A SIGNER? A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF AUTHORSHIP TRENDS IN THE FIELD OF BIOETHICS (2006)AUTHOR, CONTRIBUTOR OR JUST A…Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers (2003)Unethical practices in author…The Responsible Conduct of Research (2001)The Responsible Conduct of Re…The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers (2018)The rules and realities of au…How do you write and present research well? 8 — Assign authorship according to intellectual involvement (2016)How do you write and present …When Authorship Fails (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Publish or Perish (2007)Effects of Author Contribution Disclosures and Numeric Limitations on Authorship Trends (2010)Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article (2012)An update on the “empirical turn” in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals (2018)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science (2019)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)Ghostwriting: The Dirty Little Secret of Medical Publishing That Just Got Bigger (2009)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement (2014)Honorary and ghost authorship in reports of randomised clinical trials in oncology (2016)When Authorship Fails (1997)The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism (2005)The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded (2012)Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production (2016)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Disclosure of Researcher Contributions: A Study of Original Research Articles in The Lancet (1999)Authorship for Research Groups (2002)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)On effect size. (2012)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)The Publishing Game: Getting More for Less (1981)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles (2013)Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences (2017)Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective (2006)Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Research papers 101: The do’s and don'ts of scientific writing (2021)The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. (1975)ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research (2004)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)Entrepreneurship as Method: Open Questions for an Entrepreneurial Future (2011)The machine question: critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics (2013)30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas420 cited
  • 2001The Responsible Conduct of Research393 cited
  • 2022Responsible Conduct of Research223 cited
  • 2003Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers216 cited
  • 2008Authorship: why not just toss a coin?190 cited
  • 2011Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies134 cited
  • 2006AUTHOR, CONTRIBUTOR OR JUST A SIGNER? A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF AUTHORSHIP TRENDS IN THE FIELD OF BIOETHICS58 cited
  • 2010How ghost-writing threatens the credibility of medical knowledge and medical journals34 cited

Cited by

  • 2018The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers14 cited
  • 2016How do you write and present research well? 8 — Assign authorship according to intellectual involvement12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work