Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature

16 references·16 citing·32 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews2,515 cited
2001Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis2,229 cited
2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,179 cited
2003Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2,068 cited

2000Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research1,795 cited

Cited by

2022JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI125 cited
2013Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews116 cited
2021Psychological distress among healthcare providers during COVID-19 in Asia: Systematic review and meta-analysis106 cited
2015Choice architecture interventions for increased vegetable intake and behaviour change in a school setting: a systematic review97 cited
2023Heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comprehensive overview91 cited
2019How effective are films in inducing positive and negative emotional states? A meta-analysis90 cited
2016Applicable or non-applicable: investigations of clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews57 cited
2021A new tool to assess Clinical Diversity In Meta‐analyses (CDIM) of interventions44 cited
2018Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics43 cited
2020Sample size, study length, and inadequate controls were the most common self-acknowledged limitations in manual therapy trials: A methodological review41 cited
2015Exploring Treatment by Covariate Interactions Using Subgroup Analysis and Meta-Regression in Cochrane Reviews: A Review of Recent Practice37 cited
2021Assessing and Exploring Heterogeneity27 cited
2019A systematic survey identified 36 criteria for assessing effect modification claims in randomized trials or meta-analyses24 cited
2022Comparability of Patients in Trials of eHealth and Face-to-Face Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Depression: Meta-synthesis19 cited
2019A meta-epidemiological study of subgroup analyses in cochrane systematic reviews of atrial fibrillation19 cited
2017An approach to addressing subpopulation considerations in systematic reviews: the experience of reviewers supporting the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force17 cited