An internalization theory rationale for MNE regional strategy

Alain C. Verbeke · Liena L. Kano

63 citations0/0 files storedMultinational Business Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

International Business and FDI Innovation and Knowledge Management Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Purpose This paper seeks to demonstrate that internalization theory, as a “complete” theory of the firm, is particularly well equipped to analyze multinational enterprise (MNE) regional strategies, thanks to its joint transaction cost economics and resource‐based foundations. Design/methodology/approach This paper builds on recent work by Wolf, Egelhoff, and Dunemann to show that internalization theory's predictions on MNE regional strategy are superior to those suggested by several other conceptual frameworks. For each of the 11 hypotheses formulated by Wolf and his co‐authors, an alternative is proposed here that is consistent with internalization theory predictions. Findings MNE regional strategy is an important empirical phenomenon. Internalization theory, as a powerful conceptual framework with general applicability, simplicity and accuracy, allows in‐depth analysis of MNE regional strategies. Research limitations/implications Internalization theory scholars need to find new ways of operationalizing MNE firm‐specific advantages (FSAs), as well as MNE resource recombination trajectories, to predict accurately when and how MNEs will pursue regional versus global strategies. Practical implications MNE senior management should rethink international expansion strategies and realize that most large MNEs actually pursue regional, not global strategies. Social implications Even the world's largest MNEs have great difficulty engaging in novel resource recombination across the globe, and their alleged market power should therefore not be overestimated. Originality/value International business scholars should embrace internalization theory as the general theory of the MNE, rather than looking for insight from theories not intended – nor properly equipped – to study strategies of the world's most complex entrepreneurial organizations.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 63 citations exist upstream.

References

1983The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields 1977Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony 2004The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields 1937The Nature of the Firm 1980Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors 1995The Theory of the Growth of the Firm 1976Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.1977The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments

Cited by

2016The Laws of Globalization and Business Applications 2016Inside the regional multinationals: A new value chain perspective on subsidiary capabilities 2019Dynamic capabilities and internationalization of authentic firms: Role of heritage assets, administrative heritage, and signature processes 2015The Effect of Global Orientation on the Performance of International New Ventures: Evidence from Italy 2019Lost that lovin’ feeling: The erosion of trust between small, high-distance partners

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.