The effects of foreign accents on employment‐related decisions

Megumi Hosoda · Eugene F. Stone‐Romero

210 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Managerial Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research Linguistic Variation and Morphology Social and Intergroup Psychology

Abstract

Purpose Although statistical evidence clearly demonstrates discrimination against foreign‐accented individuals in the workplace, surprisingly little research attention has been paid to how such individuals are evaluated when they apply for jobs. Thus, the aim of this paper is to examine the effects of applicant accent on access‐related employment decisions across four jobs that differed on job status and communication demands. Design/methodology/approach The study used a 3 (applicant accent: Standard American English, French, and Japanese) × 2 (job status: low vs high)×2 (communication demands: low vs high) mixed‐factorial design, and data from 286 college students at two different locations. Findings Results show that in comparison with French‐accented applicants, Japanese‐accented applicants fared worse on employment‐related decisions, especially for jobs that had high communication demands, even after controlling for applicant understandability and location. French‐accented applicants were viewed as favorably as, or more favorably than, Standard American English‐accented applicants. Research limitations/implications Applicant accent was confounded with applicant names. Thus, it is not known whether the obtained results are due to applicant accent, names, or both. Practical implications It was found that organizations could do one of the following: use structured interviews; train interviewers on potential biases against foreign‐accented applicants; and provide more individuating information to reduce the effects of accent‐based stereotypes on employment‐related decisions. Originality/value The paper considers the communication demands of jobs and job status as influences on the evaluation of foreign‐accented applicants.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 210 citations exist upstream.

References

1999English with an accent: Language ideology and discrimination in the United States. By Rosina Lippi-Green. London & New York: Routledge, 1997. Pp. xviii, 286.1980Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review.2006Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content Model 1986The "Science of the Sophomore" Revisited: From Conjecture to Empiricism 1997A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEW 1980Sex stereotypes and social judgment.2004Stereotype Content Model Explains Prejudice for an Envied Outgroup: Scale of Anti-Asian American Stereotypes 2001Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.

Cited by

2012The effect of Hispanic accents on employment decisions 2016The effect of foreign accent on employability: a study of the aural dimensions of aesthetic labour in customer-facing and non-customer-facing jobs 2013Political skill: Explaining the effects of nonnative accent on managerial hiring and entrepreneurial investment decisions.2015Voice Quality and Identity

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.