ASSESSING ATTITUDES TOWARD THE ELDERLY: POLIZZI'S REFINED VERSION OF THE AGING SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL

Kenneth G. Polizzi

117 citations0/0 files storedEducational Gerontology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Aging and Gerontology Research Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Social and Intergroup Psychology

Abstract

While the number of elderly men and women continues to grow, an accurate assessment of attitudes toward the elderly remains difficult. Many problems exist that contribute to this difficulty of assessment. The first problem is the age of the Aging Semantic Differential, an instrument often used for the assessment of attitudes toward the elderly. The adjectives employed are not necessarily descriptive of attitudes today. Another problem was the failure to employ women as attitudinal objects as well as men in the original instrument. Therefore, the Aging Semantic Differential is perhaps outdated for such assessments of attitudes toward today's elderly population. The purpose of this study was to refine the Aging Semantic Differential for the purpose of more accurately assessing current attitudes toward older people in general by generating a more up-to-date list of adjectives. Possible differences in attitude toward men and women were assessed in order to establish a refined list of adjectives for use on the generalized elderly population. Three hundred undergraduate students (136 men, 164 women) evaluated men and women 70-85 years of age. The results of the factor analyses revealed strong similarities in item composition on four factors of the factor structures for old men and old women; however, the orders of the loadings were different on each of the four factors. The final list of adjectives has Cronbach alphas of .9737 and .9713, and test-retest reliabilities of .8127 and .7938 for the old men and the old women, respectively. Recommendations are made on the use of the updated list of adjectives, as well as for methodological and conceptual considerations for future research. Also, future research is called for to determine attitudes toward the elderly rather than to debate the number of factors necessary to explain the attitude concept, as has been done in a majority of studies concerning attitudes toward the elderly.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 117 citations exist upstream.

References

1957The Measurement of Meaning 1983FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR 1961Attitudes toward old people: The development of a scale and an examination of correlates.1969A Factor Analysis of Attitudes Toward the Aged

Cited by

2010Changing Medical Students' Attitudes Toward Older Adults 2012Health professionals' attitudes toward older people and older patients: A systematic review 2019Where are we now in relation to determining the prevalence of ageism in this era of escalating population ageing?2011Empathetic Responses and Attitudes about Older Adults: How Experience with the Aging Game Measures Up 2022Interventions to improve attitudes toward older people in undergraduate health and social sciences students. A systematic review and meta-analysis 2004ATTITUDES ABOUT AGING AND GENDER AMONG YOUNG, MIDDLE AGE, AND OLDER COLLEGE-BASED STUDENTS 2018The Effectiveness of the Young–Old Link and Growth Intergenerational Program in Reducing Age Stereotypes 2007The perceived credibility of older adults as witnesses and its relation to ageism

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.