SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment
13 references·3 citing·34 second hop
An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment (2005)An analysis of systematic reviews indicat…The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews (2001)The art of quality assessment…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Impact of Study Quality on Outcome in Placebo-Controlled Trials of Homeopathy (1999)Impact of Study Quality on Ou…Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)Assessing the quality of repo…'Early warning systems' for identifying new healthcare technologies. (1999)'Early warning systems' for i…The Delphi List (1998)The Delphi ListEmpirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasSystematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Invited Commentary: Re: “A Critical Look at Some Popular Meta-Analytic Methods” (1994)Invited Commentary: Re: “A Cr…Invited Commentary: A Critical Look at Some Popular Meta-Analytic Methods (1994)Invited Commentary: A Critica…Quality appraisal for systematic literature reviews of health state utility values: a descriptive analysis (2022)Quality appraisal for systema…Evaluating Approaches to Quality Assessment in Library and Information Science LIS Systematic Reviews: A Methodology Review (2016)Evaluating Approaches to Qual…Limited evidence for effects of diet for type 2 diabetes from systematic reviews (2007)Limited evidence for effects …Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study (2005)Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned (2006)Estimates of Quality and Reliability With the Physiotherapy Evidence-Based Database Scale to Assess the Methodology of Randomized Controlled Trials of Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Interventions (2006)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)A Meta-analytic Review of Components Associated with Parent Training Program Effectiveness (2008)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies (2004)A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling: Effectiveness and Moderating Variables (2008)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1998The Delphi List2,379 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 1994Invited Commentary: A Critical Look at Some Popular Meta-Analytic Methods508 cited
  • 1999Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.368 cited
  • 2001The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews245 cited
  • 1999Impact of Study Quality on Outcome in Placebo-Controlled Trials of Homeopathy204 cited
  • 1999'Early warning systems' for identifying new healthcare technologies.189 cited
  • 1994Invited Commentary: Re: “A Critical Look at Some Popular Meta-Analytic Methods”115 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Quality appraisal for systematic literature reviews of health state utility values: a descriptive analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

15 cited
  • 2016Evaluating Approaches to Quality Assessment in Library and Information Science LIS Systematic Reviews: A Methodology Review12 cited
  • 2007Limited evidence for effects of diet for type 2 diabetes from systematic reviews9 cited