SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Availability of results from clinical research: Failing policy efforts
11 references·2 citing·46 second hop
Availability of results from clinical research: Failing policy efforts (2013)Availability of results from clinical res…Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to Track Results of Interventional Human Clinical Trials (2013)Linking ClinicalTrials.gov an…Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical Publications (2012)Trial Registration Numbers Ar…Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis (2012)Publication of NIH funded tri…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey (2009)Compliance of clinical trial …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor (2008)Systematic reviewers commonly…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author's Reply to Goodman and Greenland (2007)Why Most Published Research F…How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. (1997)How important is publication …Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away (1993)Publication Bias: The Problem…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …Predicting Publication of Clinical Trials Using Structured and Unstructured Data: Model Development and Validation Study (2022)Predicting Publication of Cli…Trial2rev: Combining machine learning and crowd-sourcing to create a shared space for updating systematic reviews (2019)Trial2rev: Combining machine …Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Cochrane Library (2005)Impact of contacting study authors to obtain additional data for systematic reviews: diagnostic accuracy studies for hepatic fibrosis (2014)Systematic reviews with language restrictions and no author contact have lower overall credibility: a methodology study (2015)How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors (2016)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Some main problems eroding the credibility and relevance of randomized trials. (2008)A Central Theory of Biology (2015)Biases and imperatives in handling medical technology (2019)Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials (2011)A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results (2017)Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs (2017)The significance of the trial outcome was associated with publication rate and time to publication (2017)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making (2002)Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2014)Clinical Trial Registration (2004)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study (2016)Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting (2016)Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of “Instructions for Authors” (2016)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)A Review of Transformational School Leadership Research 1996–2005 (2005)Review: Immigrants and Health Care Access, Quality, and Cost (2009)About and beyond leading uniqueness and belongingness: A systematic review of inclusive leadership research (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 1993Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away427 cited
  • 2012Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis371 cited
  • 1997How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.311 cited
  • 2007Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author's Reply to Goodman and Greenland110 cited
  • 2013Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to Track Results of Interventional Human Clinical Trials90 cited
  • 2012Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical Publications79 cited
  • 2008Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor70 cited
  • 2009Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey62 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Trial2rev: Combining machine learning and crowd-sourcing to create a shared space for updating systematic reviews24 cited
  • 2022Predicting Publication of Clinical Trials Using Structured and Unstructured Data: Model Development and Validation Study15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work