SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Automating risk of bias assessment for clinical trials
16 references·1 citing·47 second hop
Automating risk of bias assessment for clinical trials (2014)Automating risk of bias assessment for cl…The automation of systematic reviews (2013)The automation of systematic …Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews (2013)Pinpointing needles in giant …Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: tools and methods (2013)Modernizing the systematic re…Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study (2013)Incorporation of assessments …Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Influence of reported study d…Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center (2012)Deploying an interactive mach…A Web-based archive of systematic review data (2012)A Web-based archive of system…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)Cochrane Database of Systemat…Towards Automating the Initial Screening Phase of a Systematic Review (2010)Towards Automating the Initia…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study (2009)Risk of bias versus quality a…Updating Systematic Reviews (2007)Updating Systematic ReviewsReducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Reducing Workload in Systemat…Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence (1997)Systematic Reviews: Critical …Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Classifying Positive Results in Clinical Psychology Using Natural Language Processing (2024)Classifying Positive Results …Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (2008)Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews (2016)Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation (2020)The American Heritage Word Frequency Book (1973)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation (2014)RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials (2015)Development of the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta‐analyses and systematic reviews (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2020)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions: explanation and elaboration (2006)Burnout in Sport: A Systematic Review (2007)Intimate Partner Violence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (2012)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools (2018)Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2019)The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses (2012)Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders (2014)Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2011Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews4,664 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2012Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.668 cited
  • 2012Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center530 cited
  • 2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
  • 2009Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study348 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence262 cited
  • 2013Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews170 cited
  • 2013The automation of systematic reviews131 cited
  • 2012A Web-based archive of systematic review data66 cited
  • 2013Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study66 cited
  • 2010

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Towards Automating the Initial Screening Phase of a Systematic Review
60 cited
  • 2007Updating Systematic Reviews51 cited
  • 2013Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: tools and methods51 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Classifying Positive Results in Clinical Psychology Using Natural Language Processing1 cited