Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches

Abstract

Following publication of our article [1], it has come to our attention that two of the formulae in Table 1 were incorrect.The formulae for the measures of precision and burden have been corrected (Table 1).We are publishing this erratum to update these formulae to the following:

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 353 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.