SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches
14 references·16 citing·40 second hop
Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining for study i…Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2017)Searching for studies: a guid…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)An Introduction to Systematic…Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center (2012)Deploying an interactive mach…Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Clarifying differences betwee…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Semi-automated screening of b…Supporting Systematic Reviews Using Text Mining (2009)Supporting Systematic Reviews…Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Reducing Workload in Systemat…A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)A Brief History of Research S…Untangling text data mining (1999)Untangling text data miningSystematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Automated Paper Screening for…Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews (2021)Research Screener: a machine …Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists (2021)Introduction to PRISMA 2020 a…How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide (2021)How to conduct a meta-analysi…Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)Machine learning reduced work…Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews (2020)Error rates of human reviewer…The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews (2019)The value of a second reviewe…revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis (2019)revtools: An R package to sup…Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines (2019)Mapping of reporting guidance…Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error (2019)Machine learning algorithms f…Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Making progress with the auto…Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery (2017)Optimal literature search for…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…SWIFT-Review: a text-mining workbench for systematic review (2016)SWIFT-Review: a text-mining w…Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas (2016)Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool f…Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review (2015)Automating data extraction in…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review (2014)Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) (2015)A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences (2016)The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science (1997)Discovering evolutionary theme patterns from text (2005)Text Mining Infrastructure in R (2008)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions (2001)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health (2013)RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series (2018)Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools (2018)Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2019)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 2013An Introduction to Systematic Reviews1,235 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2012Clarifying differences between review designs and methods1,061 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 1999Untangling text data mining883 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2002A Brief History of Research Synthesis552 cited
  • 2012Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center530 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
  • 2017Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews371 cited
  • 2010Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews351 cited
  • 2009Supporting Systematic Reviews Using Text Mining144 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

354 cited
  • 2016Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas326 cited
  • 2019The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews300 cited
  • 2015Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review286 cited
  • 2021Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists271 cited
  • 2019revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis260 cited
  • 2020Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews252 cited
  • 2017Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery248 cited
  • 2021How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide217 cited
  • 2020Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews214 cited
  • 2019Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines207 cited
  • 2023Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study205 cited
  • 2016SWIFT-Review: a text-mining workbench for systematic review196 cited
  • 2018Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)191 cited
  • 2021Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews190 cited
  • 2019Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error185 cited