Examining leadership through critical feminist readings

Jackie Margaret Ford

66 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Health Organization and Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Gender Diversity and Inequality Gender and Feminist Studies Leadership and Management in Organizations

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper seeks to explore a critique of the limitations of mainstream leadership research and publications and offers a critical management analysis through drawing on a feminist reading of leadership in organizations. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: There has recently been witnessed a growing interest in the promotion of effective leadership within both organizational studies literature and organisational policy as the route to ensuring employee commitment and enhanced organisational performance and the achievement of ever demanding goals and targets. This turn to leadership is represented in both an upsurge of research studies and a proliferation in the promotion of leadership as the organisational panacea. An analysis of the literature on leadership was undertaken, giving due consideration to mainstream and more critical accounts in relation to illustrations drawn from the UK National Health Service (NHS). FINDINGS: This paper explores mainstream literature on leadership and finds it wanting, in terms of its failure to deliver a common understanding of the concept, in its generally uncritical accounts, and its inability to expose the androcentric nature of the core assumptions within hegemonic discourses of leadership. Drawing on critical feminist readings in relation to the UK NHS, a more critical account of leadership is presented. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Greater awareness is required for the adoption of culturally sensitive and locally-based approaches that take account of individuals' experiences, identities and power relations and that allows for the presence of a range of masculine and feminine workplace behaviours. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This paper provides an overview of the dominant themes within the literature on leadership as they relate to the UK NHS, and presents a feminist critique of the more subtle ways in which notions of leadership in organisations fail to consider their potential for bias.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 66 citations exist upstream.

References

1990HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:2015Leadership : Theory and Practice 19771.7 THIS SEX WHICH IS NOT ONE 1985The social constructionist movement in modern psychology.1992Management research: An introduction 2015An Invitation to Social Construction 2002Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual 2002Understanding Organizational Culture

Cited by

2015Followers in leadership theory: Fiction, fantasy and illusion 2010Papering the Cracks with Discourse: The Narrative Identity of the Authentic Leader 2014Servant-Leadership: A Feminist Perspective 2020Responsible talent management: towards guiding principles 2017Gender bias in hospital leadership: a qualitative study on the experiences of women CEOs 2017Examining the Politics of Gendered Difference in Feminine Leadership: The Absence of ‘Female Masculinity’

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.