SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers
15 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers (2011)Scientific production and impact of natio…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2019)Why Most Published Research F…How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network (2009)How citation distortions crea…Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Report From the Institute of Medicine (2009)Comparative Effectiveness Res…Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation (2009)Challenges in evaluating surg…Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Produc…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…De Testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions (2008)De Testimonio: on the evidenc…Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. (2007)Factors associated with citat…The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency (2006)The relationship between qual…Assessing Prevention Research ImpactA Bibliometric Analysis (2006)Assessing Prevention Research…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)Relative Citation Impact of V…External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)External validity of randomis…The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor (2004)The level of non-citation of …Randomized, controlled trials in surgery (2001)Randomized, controlled trials…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health Interventions (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)Referencing as Persuasion (1977)A Simple Model of Herd Behavior (1992)Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy (2010)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Power-law distributions in empirical data (2018)Misinformation in and about science (2021)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology (2007)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages (2013)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Pharmacoeconomics: NICE's approach to decision‐making (2009)Pragmatic randomized controlled trial of long‐term psychoanalytic psychotherapy for treatment‐resistant depression: the Tavistock Adult Depression Study (TADS) (2015)Outcome of Psychoanalytic and Cognitive-Behavioural Long-Term Therapy with Chronically Depressed Patients: A Controlled Trial with Preferential and Randomized Allocation (2018)Relative efficacy of drugs: an emerging issue between regulatory agencies and third-party payers (2010)Use of 3x2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies (2012)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
  • 2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,556 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,207 cited
  • 2009Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation654 cited
  • 2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence608 cited
  • 2009Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Report From the Institute of Medicine526 cited
  • 2009How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network522 cited
  • 2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences511 cited
  • 2019Why Most Published Research Findings Are False471 cited
  • 2008De Testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions222 cited
  • 2001Randomized, controlled trials in surgery201 cited
  • 2006The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency185 cited
  • 2004The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor157 cited
  • 2007Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature.120 cited
  • 2006

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Assessing Prevention Research ImpactA Bibliometric Analysis
37 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.