Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

John P. A. Ioannidis

463 citations0/0 files storedCHANCE

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Publishing and Open Access Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

Reprinted courtesy of the Public Library of ScienceEditor's note: This article contains opinion on topics of broad interest and does not necessarily reflect the views of CHANCE.There is increasing ...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 463 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement 1992A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research 2000Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia

Cited by

2013Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology 2012Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting 2012The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.2010Efficacy of cognitive–behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.