SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleTen ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers

Karl John Friston2012

Article2012

Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers

Karl John Friston

353 citations·0/0 files stored·NeuroImage

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 353 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 2009An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.1999Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.1990Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research.2007Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter Estimation 2019Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Cited by

2016Pregnancy leads to long-lasting changes in human brain structure 2014The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power 2017Sample Size, Statistical Power, and False Conclusions in Infant Looking‐Time Research 2013The effects of psychotherapy on brain function: A systematic and critical review 2018Potential Reporting Bias in Neuroimaging Studies of Sex Differences 2013Potential Reporting Bias in fMRI Studies of the Brain 2013Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2013Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychologyarticle · 3 shared references 2021Qualitative Research Methodschapter · 3 shared references 2012Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Sciencearticle · 3 shared references 2021Research Design in Clinical Psychologybook · 3 shared references 2024Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Sizearticle · 3 shared references 2011Sample Size in Psychological Research over the Past 30 Yearsarticle · 3 shared references

Details

Year2012

Typearticle

Published2012-04-13

VenueNeuroImage

ISSN-L1053-8119

Languageen

Citations353

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.018

openalex_workW2156285102

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2018

Welcome to the jungle! The neuromarketing literature through the eyes of a newcomer