SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
CONSORT 2010 and Controversies Regarding Assessment of Blindness in RCTs
9 references·1 citing·33 second hop
CONSORT 2010 and Controversies Regarding Assessment of Blindness in RCTs (2010)CONSORT 2010 and Controversies Regarding …CONSORT 2010 changes and testing blindness in RCTs (2010)CONSORT 2010 changes and test…Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding (2007)Blinded trials taken to the t…Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Bias in Clinical Intervention…Turning a blind eye:Testing the success of blinding and the CONSORT statement (2004)Turning a blind eye:Testing t…Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials (2004)Turning a blind eye: the succ…Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasBlinding Assessment (2021)Blinding AssessmentA method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Handbook of research on teaching (1986)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) (2005)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2011)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis (2019)Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology: Table 1 (1996)Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Intentional Ignorance: A History of Blind Assessment and Placebo Controls in Medicine (1998)Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study (2020)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias7,306 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
  • 2006Bias in Clinical Intervention Research636 cited
  • 2004Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials262 cited
  • 2007Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding205 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 changes and testing blindness in RCTs156 cited
  • 2004Turning a blind eye:Testing the success of blinding and the CONSORT statement41 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Blinding Assessment5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work