Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Effects of pre‐trial publicity and jury deliberation on juror bias and source memory errors

16 references·16 citing·37 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1982Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models12,786 cited
1969Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources752 cited
1999The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?682 cited
1966Scales for the measurement of ethos646 cited
1988Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment.573 cited
1981Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades569 cited
2001Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups.525 cited
1996Communication and Group Decision Making465 cited
1993The story model for juror decision making313 cited
1984Evaluating witness evidence310 cited
1990Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence.267 cited
1994Perceptions of Children's Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases1224 cited
1990Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias.202 cited
1987When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony.142 cited
1994The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments.107 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2004Understanding Pretrial Publicity: Predecisional Distortion of Evidence by Mock Jurors.90 cited

Cited by

2010The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation62 cited
2011Behind closed doors: the effect of pretrial publicity on jury deliberations54 cited
2011Positive and Negative Pretrial Publicity46 cited
2014From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors’ decisions, impressions, and memory.45 cited
2014Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: Issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability.28 cited
2018The media’s impact on the right to a fair trial: A content analysis of pretrial publicity in capital cases.27 cited
2009Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors27 cited
2013Perceptions of Defendant Culpability in Pretrial Publicity: The Effects of Defendant Ethnicity and Participant Gender25 cited
2018The Role of Defendant Race and Racially Charged Media in Canadian Mock Juror Decision Making23 cited
2016The Impact of Emotions on Juror Judgments and Decision-Making23 cited
2017Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors’ guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.23 cited
2020Jury simulation studies: To exclude or not to exclude participants based on a lack of comprehension of the case?21 cited
2018The Contemporary American Jury17 cited
2021Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions17 cited
2011Pretrial publicity and juror age affect mock-juror decision making15 cited
2021Effect of pretrial publicity via social media, mock juror sex, and rape myth acceptance on juror decisions in a mock sexual assault trial14 cited