Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The rationality of different kinds of intuitive decision processes

16 references·16 citing·39 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1999Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart3,562 cited
2004Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment3,536 cited
2002Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment3,474 cited
2002Heuristics and Biases2,214 cited
1988Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.1,953 cited
1993Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.1,935 cited
2009Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences1,799 cited
1981Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?1,224 cited
1978A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies920 cited
2001Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionst model of decision making.758 cited
1999Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction.407 cited
2009Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making397 cited
1999MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood.349 cited
1991The Rhetoric of Irrationality346 cited
2008The Routines of Decision Making331 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments.307 cited

Cited by

2013Can We Trust Intuitive Jurors? Standards of Proof and the Probative Value of Evidence in Coherence‐Based Reasoning43 cited
2018Kenneth R. Hammond’s contributions to the study of judgment and decision making35 cited
2014Utilizing probabilities as decision weights in closed and open information boards: A comparison of children and adults34 cited
2015Lost in search: (Mal-)adaptation to probabilistic decision environments in children and adults.34 cited
2018Children’s Neglect of Probabilities in Decision Making with and without Feedback21 cited
2018Children’s application of decision strategies in a compensatory environment21 cited
2018Some Metatheoretical Reflections on Adaptive Decision Making and the Strategy Selection Problem16 cited
2014Cognitive integration of recognition information and additional cues in memory-based decisions15 cited
2016How to Identify Strategy Use and Adaptive Strategy Selection: The Crucial Role of Chance Correction in Weighted Compensatory Strategies11 cited
2016Psychology and Disaster: Why We Do Not See Looming Disasters and How Our Way of Thinking Causes Them8 cited
2021From perception to inference: Utilization of probabilities as decision weights in children5 cited
2022The association between experience‐based risky choice and mathematical ability3 cited
2022When even the smartest fail to prioritise: overuse of information can decrease decision accuracy2 cited
2018Meaningful Model Comparisons have to Include Reasonable Competing Models and also all Data: A Rejoinder to Rieskamp (2018)2 cited
2020Teaching children to take the best2 cited
2026Intuitive and deliberate decisions can be accounted for by the same cognitive process model1 cited