Validation of Two Quality Scales for Children's Figure Drawings

D. J. W. Struempfer

2 citations0/0 files storedPerceptual and Motor Skills

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Abstract

Drawings by 79 children ( M 11.44 yr.) were rated on the Harris-Goodenough (HG) and Dunn-Lorge (DL) scales. Acceptable rerate, interrater, and retest reliabilities were found. Criterion measures were: HG Point Scale IQs, an individual and a group intelligence test, scholastic achievement tests, examination marks, rankings by teachers, father's occupation, a dexterity test, and Cattell's Jr.-Sr. High School Personality Questionnaire. The quality scales could be used as approximations of the point scales. Validities ranged from low to moderate. No consistent pattern of correlations with the various intelligence scores emerged. Validities tended to be higher for the HG than for the DL scores.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

References

2001An 'American psychologist'1964Children's Drawings as Measures of Intellectual Maturity 1923Mental and Scholastic Tests.1962A factor analysis of Draw-a-Person Test scores.1958Human figure drawings by younger and older adults 1968A VALIDATION OF THE HARRIS‐GOODENOUGH TEST

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.