Group awareness tools: It’s what you do with it that mattersJeroen J. H. M. Janssen, Gijsbert Erkens, Paul A. Kirschner2010-07-15articleComputers in Human Behavior166 citationsgreenNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended LearningTeam Dynamics and PerformanceAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 166 citations exist upstream.References1998Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design1997Handbook of educational psychology1995Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis2013Handbook of Educational Psychology2003Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments1991Groupware: some issues and experiences2024Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology1994Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small GroupsCited by2021Promoting regulation of equal participation in online collaboration by combining a group awareness tool and adaptive prompts. But does it even matter?2018Effects of an online team project-based learning environment with group awareness and peer evaluation on socially shared regulation of learning and self-regulated learning2010Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions2019Impact of pedagogic agent-mediated metacognitive support towards increasing task and group awareness in CSCL2019Providing different types of group awareness information to guide collaborative learning2018Group awareness increases student engagement in online collaborative writing2018Group metacognition in online collaborative learning: validity and reliability of the group metacognition scale (GMS)2013On the value of Second Life for students’ engagement in blended and online courses: A comparative study from the Higher Education in Greece