SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture
7 references·8 citing·45 second hop
A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture (2014)A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Me…Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies (2013)Overlapping meta-analyses on …Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Differences between systematic reviews/meta-analyses of hyaluronic acid/hyaluronan/hylan in osteoarthritis of the knee (2007)Differences between systemati…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. (1997)A guide to interpreting disco…Identifying and addressing conflicting results across multiple discordant systematic reviews on the same question: protocol for a replication study of the Jadad algorithm (2022)Identifying and addressing co…How can clinicians choose between conflicting and discordant systematic reviews? A replication study of the Jadad algorithm (2022)How can clinicians choose bet…The methodological quality was low and conclusions discordant for meta-analyses comparing proximal humerus fracture treatments: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)The methodological quality wa…Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology (2020)Redundant meta-analyses are c…Assessment of research waste part 1: an exemplar from examining study design, surrogate and clinical endpoints in studies of calcium intake and vitamin D supplementation (2018)Assessment of research waste …Differences between protocols for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews (2017)Differences between protocols…Use of existing systematic reviews for evidence assessments in infectious disease prevention: a comparative case study (2016)Use of existing systematic re…Disorganized Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Time to Systematize the Conduct and Publication of These Study Overviews? (2015)Disorganized Systematic Revie…The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses (2015)Methodological quality assessment of network meta-analysis of drug interventions: implications from a systematic review (2018)Systematic Reviews: Challenges for Their Justification, Related Comprehensive Searches, and Implications (2018)Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study (2019)How we should measure "change": Or should we? (1970)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)The art and science of study identification: a comparative analysis of two systematic reviews (2016)Several reasons explained the variation in the results of 22 meta-analyses addressing the same question (2019)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement (2000)Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer (2016)Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms (2017)Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)A systematic review of meta-research studies finds substantial methodological heterogeneity in citation analyses to monitor evidence-based research (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel (2023)Exploring decision-makers’ challenges and strategies when selecting multiple systematic reviews: insights for AI decision support tools in healthcare (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 1997A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.394 cited
  • 2013Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies248 cited
  • 2007Differences between systematic reviews/meta-analyses of hyaluronic acid/hyaluronan/hylan in osteoarthritis of the knee86 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Disorganized Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Time to Systematize the Conduct and Publication of These Study Overviews?58 cited
  • 2022How can clinicians choose between conflicting and discordant systematic reviews? A replication study of the Jadad algorithm24 cited
  • 2018Assessment of research waste part 1: an exemplar from examining study design, surrogate and clinical endpoints in studies of calcium intake and vitamin D supplementation14 cited
  • 2020Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology14 cited
  • 2021The methodological quality was low and conclusions discordant for meta-analyses comparing proximal humerus fracture treatments: a meta-epidemiological study13 cited
  • 2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Differences between protocols for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews
11 cited
  • 2022Identifying and addressing conflicting results across multiple discordant systematic reviews on the same question: protocol for a replication study of the Jadad algorithm8 cited
  • 2016Use of existing systematic reviews for evidence assessments in infectious disease prevention: a comparative case study8 cited