SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using the SEE-SEP Model to Analyze Upper Secondary Students’ Use of Supporting Reasons in Arguing Socioscientific Issues
16 references·5 citing·38 second hop
Using the SEE-SEP Model to Analyze Upper Secondary Students’ Use of Supporting Reasons in Arguing Socioscientific Issues (2011)Using the SEE-SEP Model to Analyze Upper …What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry? (2007)What Do Students Gain by Enga…Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality (2006)Socioscientific Argumentation…A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation (2006)A threshold model of content …Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education (2005)Beyond STS: A research-based …Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making (2004)Patterns of informal reasonin…Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research (2004)Informal reasoning regarding …THE PLACE OF ARGUMENTATION IN THE PEDAGOGY OF SCHOOL SCIENCE (2003)THE PLACE OF ARGUMENTATION IN…Science Education for Citizenship: Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues (2003)Science Education for Citizen…Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas (2002)Tangled up in views: Beliefs …Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues (2001)Scientific literacy for citiz…Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics (2001)Fostering students' knowledge…Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms (2000)Establishing the norms of sci…The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science (1999)The place of argumentation in…Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels (1996)Who Reasons Well? Two Studies…Science for all Americans (1990)Science for all AmericansThe Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)The Framing of Decisions and …Teaching Socioscientific Issues: A Systematic Review (2024)Teaching Socioscientific Issu…Writing in the Secondary-Level Disciplines: a Systematic Review of Context, Cognition, and Content (2016)Writing in the Secondary-Leve…Preservice Science Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs and Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues (2016)Preservice Science Teachers’ …Investigating the Intertwinement of Knowledge, Value, and Experience of Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation Concerning Socioscientific Issues (2016)Investigating the Intertwinem…A Framework for Teachers’ Assessment of Socio-scientific Argumentation: An example using the GMO issue (2014)A Framework for Teachers’ Ass…The Skills of Argument (1991)The Uses of Argument (2003)TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse (2004)Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals (2008)A Handbook of Child Psychology (1932)National Science Education Standards (1995)Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice (2009)In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. (1983)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy (2007)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Cognition in Practice (1988)Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom (1994)Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research (2003)Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions (2008)Science education in Europe: Critical reflections : a report to the Nuffield Foundation (2008)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The consequences of modernity (1990)Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science (2004)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students' argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science (2010)Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on (2011)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Perception of Risk (1987)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems (1995)Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment (2000)Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (1988)Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development (1996)Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry (2005)Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science (2002)Benchmarks for Science Literacy (2013)A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education (2016)Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials (2006)Project-Based Learning (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1981The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice17,834 cited
  • 2000Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms2,328 cited
  • 1990Science for all Americans1,840 cited
  • 2004Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research1,439 cited
  • 2001Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics1,346 cited
  • 2005Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education1,205 cited
  • 2001Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues804 cited
  • 2004Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making754 cited
  • 2007What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry?717 cited
  • 1999The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science619 cited
  • 2002Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas581 cited
  • 2003THE PLACE OF ARGUMENTATION IN THE PEDAGOGY OF SCHOOL SCIENCE522 cited
  • 2006Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality440 cited
  • 1996Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels433 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2003Science Education for Citizenship: Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues381 cited
  • 2006A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation339 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Teaching Socioscientific Issues: A Systematic Review85 cited
    • 2016Writing in the Secondary-Level Disciplines: a Systematic Review of Context, Cognition, and Content83 cited
    • 2016Preservice Science Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs and Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues74 cited
    • 2014A Framework for Teachers’ Assessment of Socio-scientific Argumentation: An example using the GMO issue60 cited
    • 2016Investigating the Intertwinement of Knowledge, Value, and Experience of Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation Concerning Socioscientific Issues60 cited